Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Bob Sapp Denies Throwing Fights

Game Recap: Wake Handles BC, 71-56

Wake Forest led wire to wire and honestly looked like the unquestionably better team on Saturday afternoon in an early road game against Boston College. With the loss, the possibly historically-bad (like, maybe even worse than us last year, maybe) go to 7-11, yet somehow 2-3 in the ACC.

Wake moves to 11-8, and also 2-3 in the league. It was a game of almost-correct predictions for me; Chase Fischer drilled three three-pointers and got fouled on a fourth one game after I predicted him filling it up against Duke, and Wake's two-headed monster of Travis McKie and C.J. Harris scored exactly what I predicted, but in reverse.

The Deacs led by 8 at the half and saw the lead dwindle to as little as two before the Deacs exploded on an 8-0 run and didn't look back. Wake led by as many as 17 before giving up a couple easy baskets (when it was too little, far too late for the Eagles) but Wake was ultimately able to dribble out the clock on the final margin. This game is the opposite of the Duke game in that the more I think about it, the better I feel. We got good performances from many Deacs (as is the tendency when we win) and even a couple of pleasant surprises I was entirely unaware of until I looked at the box score.

I talk specifics of this nice road win after the jump...

Star-divide

First some general notes:
  • BC's bigs got absolutely ABUSED defensively inside by the surprisingly fearsome duo of Ty Walker and Carson Desrosiers. It was absolutely key, because BC wasn't hitting their outside shots at all either. I honestly think it could've been a bit of a chicken and egg situation, where because BC couldn't hit much inside, they freaked out and rushed their outside shots.
  • Wake's offense wasn't great percentage-wise (44% from the field, 4-13 from 3 for approximately 31% from 3, and 15-20 from the line, a solid 75%). Despite these iffy percentages, Chase Fischer had probably his best game as a Deac, going 4-7, and 3-6 from three, also going 2-3 from the line (one of Chase's misses from deep was an attempt he got fouled on, so for all we know he could've ended up 4-6). Travis McKie and Nikita Mescheriakov also went 50% shooting, on 6 and 18 attempts respectively. While I'm on the subject, despite a rough day shooting for C.J. Harris, (4-12, 0-1, 7-8), the GOOD news is C.J. took 12 shots, Travis took 18, and Nikita only took 6. See what happens when your playmakers take the lion's share of the shots? Good things. Just saying.
  • Defensively, Wake's outing was...perplexing. BC was only 31% overall, and 4-21 from three for a truly anemic 19% So you'd think their defense was great, right? Well, on the interior, it absolutely was, without exaggeration. Ty Walker was an absolute monster defensively, getting 6 blocks, one of which he assisted on but was not credited for, and he also racked up a few goaltends, but at least one of those was a little questionable (the others weren't, though).
  • Travis McKie was also a defensive presence, getting 3 blocks of his own, along with 7 defensive rebounds (Ty had 9 defensive boards). Carson Desrosiers did a heck of a job filling gaps for Ty as well, racking up 8 defensive rebounds, a block, and 2 steals (man, for a 7 footer, Carson has some skilled hands) in only 16 minutes of play. It got to the point where inside, BC was almost blocking themselves, in the sense that they seemed terrified to even try shots inside. On the perimeter, obviously our defense wasn't wholly ineffective, but we were definitely aided by just a bad shooting day for the Eagles, and the four shots they did make were wide WIDE open. God we need to learn how to rotate. So very badly.
  • Wake actually won the battle of the boards by 3. Thanks Ty, Carson, and Travis. Doing work, fellas. Good to see.
  • Wake had 15 assists and only 11 turnovers, so there was good ball movement too. It honestly should've been only 8 turnovers; Wake players literally stepped on the baseline underneath BC's basket on three separate occasions. Come on fellas, you attend Wake, you're smarter than that.

Now some individual notes:

  • I'm gonna start with Ty Walker. This kid is SO improved, I can scarcely put it into words. Now I won't go with the "wisdom" of the announcer who said during yesterday's game that if Ty had played like this all four years that he'd be pushing Tim Duncan levels, but I will GLADLY say that Ty has stepped it up to a truly incredible degree, and honestly if he was having more offensive output, I'd probably put him on a ballot for Most Improved ACC Player. THIS is the Ty Walker we recruited, and I'm unbelievably happy for him. My only regret is that it's taken this long for things to click with the big man. In addition to the aforementioned rebounds, blocks, and defensive play, Ty finished with 6 points on 2-5 shooting and 2-2 from the line. Yes, in 2012, Ty Walker was at least flirting with a triple double. This is awesome. Ty also had an assist and a steal.
  • Travis McKie had another double double, 20 points (the aforementioned 9-18, 1-3, 1-1) 10 rebounds, plus an assist to go with the three blocks. Travis is really the guy that took over for Wake when BC started to make a run to get back in it. They had nobody to contend with him inside, and he absolutely exploited that.
  • C.J. had the aforementioned rough day shooting, but he still ended up with 15 points, and chipped in 3 rebounds, 5 assists, and 3 steals. Not his best day, but still a really really good day for C.J.
  • Nikita Mescheriakov was, well, Nikita. 6 points on six attempted shots, 2 rebounds, an assist, and a turnover. About the only noteworthy thing about his game for better or for worse is he had a couple of shockingly pretty spin moves in the post to actually great success. I have no real issues with his game, since he wasn't jacking up shots like usual.
  • Tony Chennault had a mixed game. He had only 9 points on 8 shots (3-8, 0-1, 3-6 from the line) and was the one guy I could point out most as having issues with defending the perimeter. Having said that, TC undoubtedly had his best game as a playmaker. The Philly product had a fantastic 6:1 A:T ratio. I mean, 6 assists and only one turnover? Dang man. If TC can just continue to work on his strength (something that's been getting slowly but surely better) and REALLY focus on perimeter D, a LOT, then I really think things can start to come together for him.
  • I already talked about Chase Fischer and Carson Desrosiers, mostly. Strong output off the bench from those two in their own ways, and I'm positively thrilled to see Chase finding his stroke from deep.
  • Daniel Green played 2 minutes and did nothing stat-wise except pick up 2 fouls. Anthony Fields did not play. On the one hand, TC was doing a really good job of running things offensively this game, especially considering the woeful NC State performance, but if Ant's not going to get playing time up double digits in the second half to BC, when IS he going to get it? Chin up, Anthony. Please don't transfer, thanks in advance.

REALLY a solid outing by the Deacs. I really don't care how bad BC is; while they're the second worst team we've played this year according to kenpom, the facts of the matter are it's a league win on the road, and it's the biggest margin of victory we've had all year, coming off of a pair of really ugly games. Furthermore, we did something neither Clemson nor Virginia Tech (admittedly without Green) couldn't do: dominated BC at Conte.

Good game overall. Even hanging in there with the positively exploding Seminoles next game is going to be a tall order, but who knows, maybe they'll come out a little bit flat footed after being so emotionally-charged. Only time will tell. As always, comments appreciated, and thanks for reading. Go Deacs.

--SF

Comment 21 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I was really happy with the way the guys played.

We actually rebounded, which was nice to see. I also LOVE what I’m seeing from Ty recently. I wish we would have gotten Fields at least a few minutes, but that’s really the only problem I head with the game as a whole.

by willisb_rad2 on Jan 22, 2012 6:23 PM EST reply actions  

Very satisfied with showing, FSU game

Very great job by wake.
Whats your thoughts and predictions on FSU game?

by wfdeacs on Jan 23, 2012 1:20 AM EST reply actions  

I was going to wait and see if the crew wanted a full preview, but...

It’s a tough nut to crack. On one hand, they’re absolutely on fire. On the other hand we know FSU has had some terrible games, it’s in the Joel, and Wake is also coming off a big win. There’s also the possibility FSU comes out a little flat-footed.

My gut instinct says something like FSU by 7.

Contributing Writer for Blogger So Dear, SBN's Wake Forest Blog

by SamuraiFoochs on Jan 23, 2012 1:59 AM EST up reply actions  

Same, Might be wayyyyyy too early....

What about us making the NIT?
Possibly NCAA?
So far, we have some decent wins (Nebraska, VT, BC, Texas Tech)
I believe we can get several more.
Having FSU on their would be HUGE.
Also, getting a win against duke or unc would be HUGE.
I say 2 more big wins for NIT.
4 more Big wins for NCAA.
Best chance for big wins…..FSU, Duke, UNC, Clemson, GT
My predictions on ACC play are we finish 10-6 or 9-7 in ACC depending on the Clemson game at their house. May be toughest road game left that we have a chance in. Virginia will blow us away.
I say we finish 6th in ACC and play Boston College which should be a gimme game.
(Sorry if this seems stupid and im dillusional)
But, I LOVE wake forest.
FSU Prediction – 76-73 wake wins (CJ hits another three with seconds too go)
Best chance to be recognized – UNC game at Wake, Would give us major popularity
Toughest road game we have chance in-Wake At Clemson
FSU will be the 2nd or 3rd toughest game of the year.
UNC being 1 because Duke keeps getting beat.
Duke maybe 2.
If we beat Duke, UNC, Clemson away, FSU at home, beat GT away then i say we make NCAA tourney as 11 seed.
If we beat Duke or UNC (Only 1), Lose to FSU, Beat clemson away, beat GT away then we Make NIT.
Most important is the 2 game stretch from 2/11 to 2/15. We play clemson and GT at home. We don’t need to fool around and we need to get those 2 wins. Then we have 1 more 2 game stretch with BC and Duke at home. BC should be easy and a warmup for the Duke game. Playing duke will not be nearly as hard as UNC. We played fairly well at Duke AT DUKE. CAMERON. THE TOUGHEST PLACE TO PLAY. I got to go to the game (awesome and my first time). But, FSU beat duke and unc ahhhh who knows. College basketball is crazy. Till then…Go deacs!
I know this is terribly long but I love talking sports.

by wfdeacs on Jan 23, 2012 11:02 AM EST reply actions  

Hahaha, no problem!

I’m the most positive guy here but I literally see NO WAY we make even the NIT, let alone the NCAA. I could see us getting close to that though, like a slightly losing record, close to even (and for what it’s worth, that’s what kenpom predicts, which is usually a decent indicator though obviously things can change).

kenpom (without getting too far into it because I’m sure a preview will come) has us losing by 12 with a 15% chance to win, but frankly I have a little more faith in us than that, especially at home with the students finally back in school.

Contributing Writer for Blogger So Dear, SBN's Wake Forest Blog

by SamuraiFoochs on Jan 23, 2012 12:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Overly optimistic

To say the least. My guess is 13-17 or 14-16 is more realistic. I think 5-11 in the conference is realistic, assuming they bring it every game. Like deacdiggler and GTS, I think we have the wrong guy at the helm to get us much past the NIT, even with next year’s recruits. I’m sure Dino is thinking “miss me yet?”

by TBlalock '86 on Jan 23, 2012 2:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Haha, Dang it!!

Well, Let’s just see how well wake can handle the big home games coming up.
But, next year, woooooooo
CAN NOT WAIT
6 recruits coming in wooo baby
Arnaud Moto is the next aminu
Devin thomas may be the next teague
or that may be mcintrye
Next year i think we have great chance at NCAA

Oh and samurai….
How do you think we will finish in ACC?
What seed in tourney?
Who do we play?
See us making it past 1st round?

(Im probably annoying you with all these)

by wfdeacs on Jan 23, 2012 12:22 PM EST reply actions  

It's all good! It's nice to have engaging reader comments!

I see us as finishing in 10th above GT and BC, maybe 9th if we hit a stride. No idea who we’ll play but I’ll go on a limb and say we win one tournament game.

Contributing Writer for Blogger So Dear, SBN's Wake Forest Blog

by SamuraiFoochs on Jan 23, 2012 4:42 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Also...

How can you have your post featured on home page?
Cause I have been here for like 2 years but never signed up…
I love wake and sports
I could do some previews, 3 up 3 down
Predictions

by wfdeacs on Jan 23, 2012 12:34 PM EST reply actions  

Really impressed with Ty…wish he had redshirted like all of us wanted him to – would love to have him next year. He’s being much more selective (in a positive manner) in his block attempts. Would like for him to cut down on the goaltending a bit.

Like the enthusiasm, wfdeacs. I am excited about the 6 coming in next year but I still think we need a coaching change.

by deacdiggler on Jan 23, 2012 1:03 PM EST reply actions  

Check it out

Just posted a preview for FSU game.
How is it?

by wfdeacs on Jan 23, 2012 2:27 PM EST reply actions  

I just saw on ESPNs conference power rankings...

That Bz said that the BC game was “our Superbowl.” Now I don’t intend to start a debate on coaching, but I’m wondering how our beating the worst team in the ACC (based on record) in January ever became worthy of the Superbowl analogy. For comparison sake, this is like calling a win over Duke in football in September the pinnacle of the football season. I really hope our school doesn’t adopt this attitude moving forward.

by MHayes on Jan 23, 2012 4:16 PM EST reply actions  

Does he not think at all about how his comments will be perceived? Ideally, our superbowl is the tournament or maybe even the ACC championship game. At this point, I can understand calling a Duke/UNC game that. BUT BC!!!!? Come on…

Listen – I dont hate Bzzz. I started out giving him a chance. I’m just convinced he’s not the man for the job. And I’m certainly not advocating that we fire him and hire someone else that is not the consensus overall number 1 replacement that excites the fan base and the team and has the coaching skills to lead this team (that’s what we did with Dino). Which is what I hope the AD is doing – waiting until the right person is found. That’s fine with me – better than replacing one stopgap with another .

by deacdiggler on Jan 23, 2012 5:44 PM EST up reply actions  

This is almost exactly my perspective.

Well put on all accounts deacdiggler.

Contributing Writer for Blogger So Dear, SBN's Wake Forest Blog

by SamuraiFoochs on Jan 23, 2012 6:25 PM EST up reply actions  

To be fair

I think what Coach said was that after the Duke game, this was our Super Bowl because it was our next game. It sounded a little funny, but he did not mean that BC was the most important game of the year for us. He was just making the point that they try to put a lot of focus on the next game.

by WFU on Jan 23, 2012 9:40 PM EST reply actions  

Yup...people took it out of context unless if you just disagree with him ever saying that.
“We immediately – after our game against Duke – when we were in our locker room in Cameron we talked about Boston College,” Wake Forest coach Jeff Bzdelik said. “This game was our Super Bowl. Not for any other reason than because it was our next game.”

From the Fayetteville Observer. I have no problem with him saying that at all, but I could see how some people would get jerked out of shape about it, especially when the magnifying glass is on him all the time.

Wake Forest '12

Mother So Dear

by RAJohnston on Jan 24, 2012 9:05 AM EST up reply actions  

I don't think it's being scrutinized simply because he's Bz

Any other coach who said that would get fans riled up. There’s a gravity that surrounds the phrase that makes it applicable in rare cases (rivalry games and mid-majors vs. BCS schools immediately come to mind). I also don’t believe that reading it as I did was taking it out of context. There were plenty of other ways he could have said it that wouldn’t have garnered the same reaction. Simply call it a must-win and communicate the same point while avoiding scrutiny.

by MHayes on Jan 24, 2012 10:34 AM EST via Android app reply actions  

Point taken...

I didn’t think that you were intentionally taking it out of context. I just meant that it seems worlds different (imo) when you don’t have the “Not for any other reason than because it was our next game,” tacked on right after it.

I don’t really see any harm in the quote, but as I said, I can see why people are taking offense to it. I just think there are other things to be worried about (our on-court play, lack of consistency, etc.), then constantly looking at Coach Bzdelik (who is admittedly a very poor public speaker) to keep screwing up and pissing off the fan base.

Wake Forest '12

Mother So Dear

by RAJohnston on Jan 24, 2012 12:03 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The only go-to Wake Forest blog for breaking news, opinions, and game analysis.

Site Owner/Managing Editor

1939093_small Martin Rickman

Editors

Ldcrunk_small WakeJake

24209_10150118159540442_563585441_11240310_5673529_n_small RAJohnston

Writers

Mckie_small BJohnston

41840_ncaa_wake_forest_texas_basketball_small Robert Reinhard

Small SamuraiFoochs

Chris-paul_small pegrcc9