Preview: Wake vs. Duke
Well guys, I'm a little inspired today, so I decided I'd get to work on a Wake/Duke game preview. I hate to say it, but statistically, we're pretty screwed. Also given the fact that it's at Cameron Indoor, it's even more of a long shot.
Still, we'd be remiss to not talk about it. There are weak spots, even with Duke, and literally nobody is unbeatable. Temple beat Duke earlier this year, and while it was admittedly at Temple, the point is that I can see Wake playing Duke close for sure, and if that was to happen, I'd be absolutely thrilled. The more I think about it in terms of matchups, the more I really think the Deacs could at least make things interesting.
After the jump, I talk stats, matchups, predictions, and even a little bit about how I plan to approach this game..
Alrighty, so first I'm going to post some stats via the wonderful kenpom. Let's make this a game! I won't tell you which team is which (hint: this game is really really easy).
Yeah, see all that green? Duke, statistically, is going to eviscerate us. It's not even a contest. There are other stats I could cap, but honestly they tell exactly the story you'd think they do: Travis McKie and C.J. Harris dominate possessions for Wake, Seth Curry and Austin Rivers especially score in droves for Duke, while Mason Plumlee and Miles Plumlee are fairly dominant rebounding forces, especially as a duo. So where on earth are we supposed to get a prayer in this game? Well, frankly, we probably don't have much of one, but here are some "weaknesses" of this Duke team.
-Wake is actually better at the line than Duke and, if I'm reading my kenpom stats correctly, gets to the line more efficiently (probably more per possession or something) and Wake also sends teams to the line less. It's NOT a drastic difference in any category, but it's there. Of course, Duke's average is brought down by Miles Plumlee, who is shooting only 42.3% from the line this year. Hack-A-Plumlee is honestly going to be a viable strategy for teams against Duke in close games this year. The good news for us is nobody in our rotation, at least those who get plenty of minutes, has a free throw percentage that bad.
-Duke actually has an A:T ratio pretty close to Wake's. Duke is far from impervious to turnovers, which may be helpful in Wake trying to keep in the game.
Also "good" news, most of the guys that played well for Wake in Cameron last year are still here. Travis McKie and C.J. Harris, two of Wake's three double digit scorers in that game, are not only still here, if anything they're playing even better (especially C.J.). By contrast, J.T. Terrell, by all accounts the biggest loss for Wake in the offseason, had a quiet game last year at Duke, with only 4 points on 7 shots, a rebound, 2 assists, and a turnover.
Additionally, Ryan Kelly is the only double digit scorer from last year's meeting that is still on the Duke team. Of course, Duke absolutely reloads, and guys like the Plumlees and Seth Curry are playing better for Duke this year than last. Having said that, it's at least worth noting that with the losses of Kyle Singler and Nolan Smith, Duke did have a major turnover in team dynamic.
The difference of course is that Wake is rebuilding under Jeff Bzdelik, and Duke is shifting with more young All-Americans and being coached by Mike Krzyzewski. We got it handed to us last year, but Singler and Smith both had 20+ point games.
Matchup wise, it's tough to talk about any given pairing without just saying "Duke's better", but I think C.J. matching up with Rivers and/or Curry has the potential to be interesting. The matchup that I'll REALLY be curious about is the new and improved Ty Walker against the Plumlees inside. If Ty can tussle with them with any degree of effectiveness, I'll consider that a pretty big positive.
Ryan Kelly, noted Wake killer, is having a good year again too, and while he's shooting almost 5% worse from the field this year than last year, he's actually doing better from three, which is rather terrifying given how badly he's lit us up the past few years.
We're not gonna win this game. It's not even gonna be a nailbiter. But I can see Wake keeping the margin in the low-to-mid double digits if they play more like the team that beat VT than the team that got destroyed by the Wolfpack, and in Cameron indoor, well, I'll take that to some degree. IT'S NOT GONNA FLY IN THE LONG TERM (sorry for the caps but needed to emphasize, but this year? Eh.
I'm hoping to see some good plays, and that's pretty much it. I'm gonna go out on a limb and say Chase Fischer has a nice game and fills it up a little bit, but Duke ultimately wins 85-70.
As always, comments and similar are appreciated. Go Deacs.
--SF
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Our biggest hope is that Duke gets complacent.
But I agree with the eviscerated comment. If the game was in Winston (or when the game is in Winston) we have a small chance at doing something, but not in Cameron.
Although it should be pointed out that this Duke team does not play elite level defense. If they let the guards jack up 3’s instead of penetrating and letting the Plumlee’s kill us on the glass, we could hang around for awhile.
Nice writeup
My prediction is 86-50. Either team could win it…….
Blogger So Dear
"Meet me on the Quad at midnight" Skip Prosser
Nebraska just beat #13 Indiana who beat Kentucky.
Transitive property what up
Contributing Writer for Blogger So Dear, SBN's Wake Forest Blog
Last year we lost 83-59, who thinks we do better this time?
For the particulars, last year’s box score link here
by Grand Tanyon Sturtze on Jan 18, 2012 11:08 PM EST reply actions
I think we do significantly better.
Though that’s obvious from my prediction. I more or less explained why from my perspective. But I’d be curious to hear everybody else.
Contributing Writer for Blogger So Dear, SBN's Wake Forest Blog
by SamuraiFoochs on Jan 18, 2012 11:48 PM EST up reply actions
If we do worse than 85-70, what would that mean to you?
by Grand Tanyon Sturtze on Jan 19, 2012 9:45 AM EST up reply actions
Not a whole hell of a lot to be honest.
Truthfully, next year is the year I really start to scrutinize Jeff Bzdelik, and I honestly mean that, because:
1. It’s his third year, meaning his initial contract will be up for renewal. He’s gotta put up quite an improvement to warrant an extension.
2. Depth is no longer an issue.
3. CJ and Travis will be upperclassmen, as will Tony and Carson.
4. It’ll be the first year with primarily Bzdelik-recruited players.
We’ll still be a little young since about half the roster is freshmen next year and an additional third or so will be sophomores, but for me personally if we don’t finish oh, let’s say around an even overall record allowing for some slight variance for how good the conference is next year, assuming there are no injuries etc. then it’s time to seriously consider not extending his contract
So I guess to put it in other terms, if we’re at least flirting with the NIT, then I’ll definitely be interested to see the terms of the extension because we shouldn’t Hewitt it up, but I don’t think I’ll be too mad about the extension, at least how things currently stand. Example: if we don’t win another game this year, I’m going to be a lot harsher next year. If we have several more NC State-esque games, then I’m gonna be harsher then too.
Contributing Writer for Blogger So Dear, SBN's Wake Forest Blog
by SamuraiFoochs on Jan 19, 2012 10:50 AM EST up reply actions
Wow
Truthfully, next year is the year I really start to scrutinize Jeff Bzdelik
I read the rest, don’t get me wrong, but wow. I’ll leave it at that.
by Grand Tanyon Sturtze on Jan 19, 2012 1:20 PM EST up reply actions
Scrutinize meaning "wonder whether he should lose his job".
In my opinion, wanting to fire a coach after one year or even two is sort of ridiculous.
Contributing Writer for Blogger So Dear, SBN's Wake Forest Blog
by SamuraiFoochs on Jan 19, 2012 7:21 PM EST up reply actions
10-4
Yep I think that’s been established
by Grand Tanyon Sturtze on Jan 19, 2012 11:00 PM EST up reply actions
Not me, My prediction (which will be on DHB tomorrow) is 84-60.
Bah da da da da da da da, Go Deacs.
Blogger So Dear
Follow @MartinRickman
by Martin Rickman on Jan 19, 2012 1:34 AM EST up reply actions
If we do worse than 84-60, what would that signal to you?
And on the flipside, if we do better than 84-60, what would that mean to you?
by Grand Tanyon Sturtze on Jan 19, 2012 9:46 AM EST up reply actions
If we do worse than 84-60, the dumpster fire is still roaring away.
If we do better than 84-60, how much better is “better?” Losing by 20 isn’t exactly a consolation prize, especially if we played like garbage and Duke missed FTs. I’m not going to buy into the team having one good five minute stretch, point to that, then say “LOOK WE PLAYED WELL AT CAMERON!!!” then excuse excuse excuse.
So, the better would have to be sustained effort throughout the game and falling just short, running out of gas, losing due to depth or foul trouble (since those are the only two regular excuses I will accept from game to game).
But to see another offensive slopfest where TC dribbles into the lane and hurls it off his foot, Nikita takes turnaround jumpers, Chase jacks up ill-advised shots, we don’t rotate on defense, we don’t start our set until the shot clock gets down to 10 seconds or less, CJ doesn’t attack, Travis doesn’t get assertive…well I won’t be jumping for joy to say the least. What that would mean is I’m still firmly in the this hire was not the right hire for Wake Forest camp.
If we somehow pull out an upset or do “better” than expectations/predictors, I’m still also firmly in the this hire was not the right hire for Wake Forest camp.
Bah da da da da da da da, Go Deacs.
Blogger So Dear
Follow @MartinRickman
by Martin Rickman on Jan 19, 2012 11:25 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
+1K
I couldn’t put it any better myself. I agree with you.
by Grand Tanyon Sturtze on Jan 19, 2012 1:21 PM EST up reply actions
I don't really base coaches on one game's performance
That being said if by some miracle we pull out a win or even keep the game competitive, I would be pretty impressed. But given the fact that Bzdelik is now 1-32 in conference road games as a BCS head coach, I’m not holding my breath.
Blogger So Dear
"Meet me on the Quad at midnight" Skip Prosser

by 

















