Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Where Do The Lakers Go From Here?

Wake Forest vs. Miami Game Preview

Miami_pri1_medium

Miami Hurricanes (14-9, 3-6) (1-6 Road, 0-4 ACC) (68 KenPom)

Wake Forest Demon Deacons (8-15, 1-7) (7-7 Home, 1-2 ACC) (252 KenPom)

TV: RSN (ACC Network)

Wake Forest is coming off two straight road blowouts to FSU and Maryland. The Hurricanes have won two straight at home over Virginia and Boston College. Hopefully the Deacs will get a home boost as the Hurricanes travel to the Joel tonight for a 7:00 tip.

Star-divide

CategoryOffenseDefenseD-I Avg
Adj. Efficiency: 111.7 40 99.4 131 101.3
Adj. Tempo: 65.8 237 67.2
Four Factors
Effective FG%: 51.7 67 47.1 95 49.0
Turnover %: 20.3 170 18.0 299 20.5
Off. Reb. %: 36.1 49 32.3 170 32.5
FTA/FGA: 41.7 78 38.4 181 38.0
Miscellaneous Components
3P%: 38.4 40 33.2 119 34.4
2P%: 48.1 161 45.7 96 47.8
FT%: 73.1 58 68.6 163 68.9
Block%: 9.8 221 10.0 126 9.2
Steal%: 10.3 253 8.9 213 9.5

Miami has been doing pretty well on offense under Frank Haith this year. They rely on a relatively slow pace (65.8 ppg), and are relatively good at everything on the offensive end. Defense has not been as strong. They are limiting opponents to .994 points per possession (remember that 1.00 is really the benchmark), which isn't bad, but it isn't good either. Miami is nearly as bad as Wake Forest at forcing turnovers, with only 18% of opponents possessions ending in a turnover. They are mediocre at defensive rebounding, as well as sending opponents to the line.

The Canes rely on a healthy 3-pt%, which is necessary because 38% of their shots are from behind the arc. They could certainly use a better percentage from inside the 3-point line, but since they limit opponents to poor shooting, it hasn't hurt them as much as it could. Free throw shooting has been a strength for the Canes (3rd in the conference; Wake is first). Ballhandling, as well as shot selection could be better as well. Frank Haith's squad gives up a lot of steals and gets a lot of their shots blocked. That may be a problem if Ty Walker sees a good amount of minutes tonight (which he could with Ari Stewart questionable for the game with an illness).

From John Gasaway

Through games of February 7, conference games only
Pace: possessions per 40 minutes
PPP: points per possession Opp. PPP: opponent PPP
EM: efficiency margin (PPP - Opp. PPP)

                      W-L   Pace    PPP   Opp. PPP    EM
1.  Duke              8-1   68.9    1.12    0.92    +0.20
2.  North Carolina    7-1   71.1    1.08    0.95    +0.13
3.  Clemson           5-4   64.5    1.05    0.97    +0.08
4.  Virginia Tech     5-4   64.7    1.06    0.98    +0.08
5.  Maryland          5-4   69.4    1.03    0.98    +0.05
6.  Florida St.       6-3   68.6    0.98    0.95    +0.03
7.  Georgia Tech      3-6   68.8    0.97    0.96    +0.01
8.  Miami             3-6   63.6    1.03    1.07    -0.04
9.  Boston College    5-4   64.8    1.08    1.14    -0.06
10. Virginia          3-6   61.3    0.97    1.05    -0.08
11. NC State          2-7   67.7    1.00    1.13    -0.13
12. Wake Forest       1-7   70.5    0.88    1.17    -0.29

 

As you can see (barely) from this chart by John Gasaway, Miami plays some of the slowest ball in the ACC during conference play. They have been alright on offense, but defense has been a struggle, ranking 9th in the ACC in Opp. PPG at 1.07. 


GAME STATISTICS
Player GP MIN PPG RPG APG SPG BPG TPG FG% FT% 3P%
Malcolm Grant 23 32.9 15.4 1.7 3.6 0.8 0.0 2.4 .423 .878 .439
Durand Scott 23 32.6 13.5 4.3 3.2 1.0 0.2 2.8 .438 .856 .383
Reggie Johnson 23 24.7 12.0 9.9 0.7 0.7 1.3 1.5 .568 .677 .000
Adrian Thomas 23 26.1 8.8 4.0 0.9 0.5 0.1 1.1 .389 .708 .392
Garrius Adams 23 28.5 7.3 3.3 1.8 1.1 0.1 1.6 .390 .623 .338
DeQuan Jones 17 15.0 5.2 2.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 1.4 .439 .640 .091
Rion Brown 23 13.7 3.7 1.5 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.8 .361 .654 .347
Julian Gamble 23 15.0 3.3 3.2 0.3 0.4 0.8 1.0 .559 .375 .000
Donnavan Kirk 13 9.5 2.7 1.6 0.0 0.2 0.3 1.1 .406 .900 .000
Erik Swoope 20 8.1 2.0 1.2 0.3 0.6 0.1 0.4 .478 .667 .000
Raphael Akpejiori 17 5.3 1.7 1.6 0.0 0.1 0.6 0.2 .556 .633 .000
Ryan Quigtar 4 1.8 0.8 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.3 1.000 .000 1.000
Totals 23 -- 73 37 12 6 4 14 .445 .731 .384

  • Miami relies heavily on an 8 man rotation, with Donnavan Kirk and Erik Swoope seeing just under 10 minutes per game.
  • Malcolm Grant, Durand Scott, and Reggie Johnson are the heart and soul of this Miami team, accounting for 41 ppg, 15 rpg, and 7 apg.
  • Reggie Johnson is a W-S Prep grad, and came right out of our own backyard. He also tore us up in the ACC Tournament last year. He does an insanely good job (#3 in the country according to KenPom) of grabbing rebounds (19% of all Miami missed shots are rebounded by Johnson). We will have to box him out when a shot goes up, or he is going to have a huge game against us.
Predictions
  • KenPom- Miami 80- Wake Forest 69 (84%)
  • Vegas has Miami -8.5 (O/U 144.5)
  • My Prediction-Miami 74- Wake 66
I think that we are going to come out hot and ready to play. Our guys know that these next two games against State and Miami are two of the more winnable games left. We got our butts handed to us on the road the past two games, but there were certainly bright spots. With Ari Stewart possibly out, Nikita will likely get a little more time than he has got. We may even go with Chennault at the start. I would guess this for our starting lineup: TC, CJ, Gary, Travis, Carson. I could see Nikita getting the nod too, but my guess is for us to downsize rather than upsize. Another combination would be Carson at the 4, and Ty at the 5, that is also quite feasible.

If we can get a moderate lead at the half and hold on to it then I could certainly see us "pulling the upset." I think at the end Miami will have a little too much size inside for us to handle, and Reggie will have a big game for the Canes.
As always, comments are welcome. I encourage everybody to get out there and support the team if you aren't already. Go Deacs!

Comment 45 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I'll be there!

I’m gonna call the “upset”, 79-74. Just got a feeling.

I could very well be wrong, but here’s hoping I’m not! Go Deacs!

by SamuraiFoochs on Feb 9, 2011 5:29 PM EST reply actions  

With the way big men have been playing against us, gotta assume Reggie Johnson is going to have a big game.

I am not sure the game is on here, which is weird. What is the new atdhe site?

by JoshuaR on Feb 9, 2011 5:53 PM EST reply actions  

Hoping for a good showing...

And feeling soberly confident. Go Deacs!

by MHayes on Feb 9, 2011 6:00 PM EST reply actions  

ah, the troupe

willisb, MHayes, JoshuaR, SamuraiFoochs, kindred spirits. Hoping for the very best & a win! But as evidenced by the almost exclusive composition here (of in-game commenters) being the tiny but vociferous band of supporters of the (so far) shattered credibility of our hc, I’m going to take a pass here because, judging from this and most of the past in-game posts, the majority of us/perhaps the more evaluatively dispassionate, passionately loyal Wake Forest alumni & fans do our more balanced rah-rah’ing either on the message boards or at least somewhere other than here. In any case, it’s the Wake Forest family. Enjoy the game!

by Grand Tanyon Sturtze on Feb 9, 2011 7:55 PM EST reply actions  

Thank goodness. Keep thinking that bashing Bzdelik makes you more loyal than me. That’s just laughable.

by JoshuaR on Feb 9, 2011 8:05 PM EST up reply actions  

really?

I’ve never been mean to you and never said I was more loyal. I hope one of the admins. warns you for being such a hothead, I was just saying we’re more dispassionate evaluatively, not more passionate Wake Forest fans. It’s disquieting that you could be so angry at someone who disagrees with you, but wasn’t even disagreeing with you in-conversation (here).

I was wishing you guys a good watch of the game tonight and saying we’re all in the Wake Forest family… Punch a pillow or chew on a stick, get that anger out elsewhere.

by Grand Tanyon Sturtze on Feb 9, 2011 8:28 PM EST up reply actions  

perhaps the more evaluatively dispassionate, passionately loyal Wake Forest alumni & fans do our more balanced rah-rah’ing either on the message boards or at least somewhere other than here.

By saying you are a part of the more passionate fan base, you are saying that. I’m just sick of you bashing Bzdelik at every corner, even if he does not deserve it (see dismissal of Tabb). You made your point the first day, no need to keep harping on it.

by JoshuaR on Feb 9, 2011 8:34 PM EST up reply actions  

it’s disjunctively phrased, that’s why a comma separates

evaluatively dispassionate from passionately loyal.
to denote that they’re separate statements within the sentence. And if you’re mad at dissent about Bzdelik, post it in a more appropriate forum (see response to your meandering accusations in re dismissal of Tabb), I won’t back down from the fact that we’re all in the Wake Forest family, even those that disagree with hotheads. I’m taking the high road, express your insecurity about vindicating the coach you have a bizarre anonymous attachment to, & continue rage on the internet proudly. To the other guys who are much better persons & can take a nice word from a stranger, we’re all part of the WF family & I wish you guys a good watch, a good game, and hope for a win!

by Grand Tanyon Sturtze on Feb 9, 2011 8:41 PM EST up reply actions  

My mom called and said she saw the score at 71-70 Deacs. I told her “I’m sure they found a way to lose.” Sure enough…oh well at least it wasn’t a blowout.

by deacdiggler on Feb 9, 2011 10:13 PM EST reply actions  

This game is the reason I have hope

The players showed heart, chemistry, and basketball IQ. The final play was one of the best drawn late game inbounds I’ve seen in a while. Seems like the players and coaches are coming together. I’m gaining confidence in this team going forward and definitely see a win in the near future.

by MHayes on Feb 9, 2011 10:42 PM EST reply actions  

Last play

It was one of the best drawn up plays in that situation I have seen in a while. What’s great is they did it without a timeout. If you missed it, check it here:

http://tlorc.wordpress.com/2011/02/10/wakes-great-last-second-play/

by JoshuaR on Feb 9, 2011 10:46 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

that really was a beautiful play.

and perfectly executed. and it was SO CLOSE. You could tell JTT thought it was going in.

by willisb_rad2 on Feb 9, 2011 10:51 PM EST up reply actions  

If he caught it cleanly it probably would have.

I am so proud of these guys for the way they played tonight.

Wake Forest '12

Mother So Dear

by RAJohnston on Feb 9, 2011 10:55 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Best game they've played all year.

Yes, better than the UVA game. CJ Harris was an utter MONSTER this game. JT Terrell actually proved to be a passing threat. Ty Walker beasted it on the offensive end. Tony Chennault continues his convalescence and improvement. Carson Desrosiers did a really good job.

I DARE anyone to say they’re not improving now. Well no I don’t because I don’t wanna fight, but whatever, y’all know what I mean.

by SamuraiFoochs on Feb 9, 2011 11:17 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I completely agree

The team is coming together, and it is obvious by watching the game that it is a sign of cohesion between the coaches and players. The players are certainly listening to the coaches, and to me at least, they have utmost respect for them.

Wake Forest '12

Mother So Dear

by RAJohnston on Feb 9, 2011 11:20 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Sunday should be a great day to regain some respect in the ACC!

by MHayes on Feb 9, 2011 11:39 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree with all three of you.

I saw a bunch of things that I LOVED tonight. Hopefully everything comes together for a full 40 minutes on Sunday!!!

by willisb_rad2 on Feb 9, 2011 11:46 PM EST up reply actions  

I thought the IOWA game was best… the perseverance and swagger of the IOWA game was better I thought, but the best ACC game by far. I am on the improvement being evident side of this game. They game-planned well for the Miami bigs, and the last play was nice… especially with no TO. But before we get crazy, it was just one game. If they can get these results the rest of the way I may be sold on them really getting better. I am proud and appreciate watching a game that kept me engaged. A loss is a loss, but close loses can be a comfort… Let’s go fellas! Make the best of what we have and build for next year!

jfizzle86... Go DEACS!!

by jfizzle86 on Feb 10, 2011 12:34 AM EST up reply actions  

Agreed, before we crown the season a success in a nailbiter loss after the infamous consecutive regressions & historically awful losses to embarrassingly uncompetitive programs/teams, let’s be realistic & pragmatic, & take this as what it is – better than what was before – but what’s sorely needed is demonstrably consistent improvement.

by Grand Tanyon Sturtze on Feb 10, 2011 12:37 AM EST up reply actions  

Nobody has crowned the season a success yet.

We are merely pointing out that we have shown improvement. Consistency is the key, and I agree that consistent improvement is the key as well.

The “historically awful losses to embarrassingly uncompetitive programs/teams” are behind us, and while they are just what you named them, should not be concerns in the future. And if they are in fact concerns then we will be getting a new coach in due time. No need to worry about that unless we get to that unfortunate point.

Wake Forest '12

Mother So Dear

by RAJohnston on Feb 10, 2011 1:13 AM EST up reply actions  

Word.

Thanks for explaining that more articulately and succinctly than I could hope to, RAJ.

They’ll be coming for NC State, if this team plays ANYTHING at all like they did tonight.

by SamuraiFoochs on Feb 10, 2011 2:13 AM EST up reply actions  

it's figurative, not literal
before we crown the season a success in a nailbiter loss

i’m pretty sure you knew that too

by Grand Tanyon Sturtze on Feb 10, 2011 8:20 AM EST up reply actions  

Oh hey, thanks for chiming in again with your negativity after a fine performance from the team.

by JoshuaR on Feb 10, 2011 7:52 AM EST up reply actions  

Agreed, before we crown the season a success in a nailbiter loss after the infamous consecutive regressions & historically awful losses to embarrassingly uncompetitive programs/teams, let’s be realistic & pragmatic, & take this as what it is – better than what was before – but what’s sorely needed is demonstrably consistent improvement.

since i’m pretty sure all i did was make a figurative statement (why RAJohnston is treating it literally is beyond me, esp since he’s already apologized for getting on my case too early twice in the last 3 days, WakeJake & MRickman are never so quick to jump on people), describe the status quo ante, state that it’s realistic & pragmatic to treat this as what it can most be treated as – better than what we had before – and conclude that what’s needed is this plus more in order for any kind of grounded optimism, please point out where i’m negative about the team’s performance against Miami.

I’m also still waiting on you to respond to everything you accused me of in the MT thread (here). You know, where you say that i blame bzdelik for MT’s departure despite multiple posts saying i think it’s shortsighted to be anything but agnostic on that issue until there’s disclosure, and say that it will probably have repercussions on recruiting when coupled with the factual season of the history plus the weak recruiting class next year, and where i ask you to back up your position claiming that MT was “walking all over” the coach & that it was a wise move despite the fact that it hasn’t even been disclosed why MT was discharged, and (for several days now) to back up this accusation

So you are a proponent of keeping players who are harming the program on the team? You want players to just walk over Bzdelik and any policies he implemented?

Show me where I’ve advocated keeping players that "are harming the program on the team." Show me where "I want players to just walk over Bzdelik and any policies he implemented." Been waiting a long time for you to back that up.

And back to the beginning, show me where I’m anything but realistic/pragmatic, and totally dogging our effort against Miami. IMO you’re not going to be able to and are hotheaded and too quick to accuse people of things

by Grand Tanyon Sturtze on Feb 10, 2011 8:33 AM EST up reply actions  

I’m done with that discussion. It’s become evident it is not worth debating with you.

by JoshuaR on Feb 10, 2011 10:00 AM EST up reply actions  

Dude

Do you realize how many things you’ve meanderingly accused me of?

1) you said I dogged the team’s effort against Miami

thanks for chiming in again with your negativity after a fine performance from the team.
and failed to point out where i was negative about the team’s performance against Miami.
2) Accused me of blaming Bzdelik for MT’s departure
We are debating you blaming Bzdelik for Tabb’s dismissal
and failed to point out where I blame Bzdelik for MT’s dismissal – which comes off as (I’m sorry but at this point) utter nonsense since (see my multiple posts below & conversing w/RA Johnston) saying that it’s totally myopic to stake out any non-neutral/non-agnostic opinion on the reasonability/stupidity of the decision to discharge MT until we eventually have disclosure.
3) Ignored my multiple posts explicitly stating that IMO in the absence of disclosure it’s myopic to say that it’s either smart/stupid that Bzdelik discharged MT until there’s disclosure and that the question raised by the discharge of a 4-star player in the absence of disclosure when coupled with the facts of the season and the coach’s resume implicates recruiting
To be more clear, I’m just as totally agnostic on that issue as you are, we won’t know & time will tell. The distinction is that I wasn’t speaking to implications re team chemistry, but to the possible/probable impact on trying to get better recruits.
and failed to point out how it probably would not.
3)
You claimed pre-disclosure that MT was walking all over the coach & that it was a good move to dismiss him, despite the fact that it hasn’t even been disclosed why MT was discharged yet (see above cite), and refused to answer my earlier, basic question to you –
Please back that claim up with something than some mishmash of personal opinion on the player & assumption on what went on behind the team’s curtains. What is your response?
4) And you accused me of being a proponent of “keeping players who are against the program on the team” and that I “want to keep players who just walk over Bzdelik and any policies he implemented”
So you are a proponent of keeping players who are harming the program on the team? You want players to just walk over Bzdelik and any policies he implemented?
and failed to point out where I’ve advocated keeping players that "are harming the program on the team." or where I’ve said that "I want players to just walk over Bzdelik and any policies he implemented." I’ve been totally civil (until this point, which after (see above) I think & feel is reasonable. After angrily accusing me so many times without backing any of your accusations up, you’re embarrassing.

by Grand Tanyon Sturtze on Feb 10, 2011 10:50 AM EST up reply actions  

Fine
before we crown the season a success in a nailbiter loss after the infamous consecutive regressions & historically awful losses to embarrassingly uncompetitive programs/teams,

There’s your negativity. Nobody was saying this loss makes the season a success, just that the team showed some improvement this game.

Not once did I say you dogged the team efforts. I think this is hilarious. You have been getting on me for twisting your words but what did you do there? Twist my words.

Like I said, not wasting my time with you anymore.

by JoshuaR on Feb 10, 2011 11:12 AM EST up reply actions  

are you blind? This distinction is staring you in the face.

You have a problem with the way I described the regression of the team before the Miami game, not negativity towards the team after its performance against Miami.

Also, thanks for failing to point out where I say it’s Bzdelik’s fault for MT’s dismissal, failing to point out how the pre-disclosure judgmentally-agnostic discharge of a 4-star player (absent ultimate disclosure) when coupled with the team’s performance this season, the sub-par recruiting class for next year (so far), and the coach’s record together doesn’t implicate recruiting in the future until there’s disclosure as to why it happened, failing to point out your pre-disclosure claim that MT was “walking all over the coach,” and failing to walk the walk for talking the talk in re claiming that

you are a proponent of keeping players who are harming the program on the team? You want players to just walk over Bzdelik and any policies he implemented?
An accusation like that begs proof. Show me where I’ve ever advocated that. Fail, fail, fail, fail.

by Grand Tanyon Sturtze on Feb 10, 2011 2:09 PM EST up reply actions  

dude, he's just going to accuse you and not justify any of those things with proof or pointing out

i’m trying to see what the guys in charge of the blog will do. if you or any of us who disagreed with RA or Josh accused them of those things, we’d be warned or worse. It needs to be fixed

Port Arthur, TX

by Screamin' Demons on Feb 11, 2011 9:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Sigh

I wish I could say this was a sign of improvement. Losing by 1 point another ho-hum ACC team at home seems like very little improvement. Sure they seemed to play essentially 40 minutes of basketball, but that should be a given every game. I know expectations are low, but I can’t lower mine that far.

by Jeremy Bishop on Feb 10, 2011 9:22 AM EST reply actions   1 recs

That’s exactly what I was going to post. Then I realized it’s no longer worth getting into debates with the anit-Bzdelik crowd. They have made up their mind about the team and nothing will change it.

by JoshuaR on Feb 10, 2011 11:12 AM EST up reply actions  

i love all of the hard-work you’ve put into gathering, organizing, and assessing both easily discoverable and discrete statistical and analytical evidence.

What’s more, I’m still waiting on you to point out where I say it’s Bzdelik’s fault for MT’s dismissal, how the pre-disclosure judgmentally agnostic discharge of a 4-star player when coupled with the team’s performance this season plus the coach’s sub-par recruiting (so far) & record together doesn’t likely affect recruiting in the future until there’s disclosure as to why it happened, to point out your pre-disclosure claim that MT was “walking all over the coach” when we that information hasn’t even been disclosed to us yet, and to point out where I’ve advocated “keeping players who are harming the program on the team,” or where I’ve advocated for “players to just walk over Bzdelik and any policies he implemented.” Being angry & casting grounded, civil dissent as quasi-traitorous isn’t responsive to the accusations that beg bearing out. Get after it. Stilll waiting….

by Grand Tanyon Sturtze on Feb 10, 2011 2:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Sign of Improvement?

RA & Joshua – look, I have already given up on this year. Am I anti-Bzdelik? Probably, he hasn’t given me much reason not to be. BUT, how can you say losing at home to a 3-6 ACC team that was 1-6 on the road this year and had a 13 game road ACC losing streak is a sign of improvement? Is this like saying the Cavaliers only losing to the Pistons by 6 was improvement?

Optimism is a great thing, as a long standing Wake fan, I am always optimistic in our bad years – I remember a couple of years ago thinking a Justin Gray & Eric Williams led team can roll through the ACC tournament and get us into the 64 – I can’t be optimistic about a close loss against a team that has been a perennial bottom dweller since entering the ACC.

I get it – both of you are probably still at Wake, it’s tougher to be realistic when you are so close. But, Really? Sign of improvement? Wasn’t the Virginia game also a sign of improvement? What happened after that?

Having said that, I hope you guys are right.

by DaDeacs on Feb 11, 2011 4:27 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

SO well put!

RAJohnston is just a kid who won’t even grad. college until 2012 and is on-record in the MT thread as being too quick to lose his temper with people who don’t share his views on bzdelik – i can’t remember if it was jfizzle or gts where he did & had to apologize – and it seems Joshua’s probably still in school too. They just don’t have enough distance or age to react without prejudice towards anyone who dissents from bzdelik

Port Arthur, TX

by Screamin' Demons on Feb 11, 2011 9:15 PM EST up reply actions  

MTRickman I rec'd your message

And I totally respect it, I just want some feedback regarding what I said that needs some kind of responsive answer.

The thing is, we understand that RAJohnston writes here, but compared to others he’s just not good. First, he’s just a student who’s younger than almost all of us here – this is unlike all of the other ACC blogs to the best of my knowledge. Second, he’s much too quick to accuse people who disagree with him of things they never did, simply because they dissent from him, like here when he lost his temper and said that GTS was “spewing false facts”

You are entitled to your opinion, I would just prefer that you not spew it as fact when it is almost certainly not the case.
and had to recant later, and then accused GTS, who’s compiled more info. on the seasonal regression, until this 1-point loss to Miami, than anyone else here (and just happens to be part of the majority anti-Bzdelik camp that increasingly doesn’t have a voice here because we disagree with one of the admins. and he controls the discourse, even though he’s the one who’s lost his temper and had to apologize for wrongful conduct to others than any of us have), re a very polite post stating that all things being hte same if WF doesn’t reveal why MT was dismissed then good 3 and 4-star recruits might have second thoughts about us, of purely “spinning”

I just don’t think that trying to spin everything that Coach Bzdelik does or says is a very good way to support the University that we care about in a public forum. That’s all.

and did an incredibly poor job refereeing bad behavior by people just ad hom’ing anyone who dissents from his opinion on Coach Bzdelik (see link here for proof!)

MHayes: I would say that Williams and McFarland panned out. CJ Harris also is a 3* who I believe will be looked at as panning out. I agree that this cannot be a regular occurrence if we want to compete in the ACC and nationally. From the looks of the prospects for 2012, it won’t be.
GTS: Considering that we went 36 years between conference championships in football, citing the 2006 football team IMO is rather utopian, & citing the football program is more ominous than hope-inspiring

Chas McFarland & L.D. Williams were recruited as role players, not cornerstones.

In contrast, we are commemorating a ‘new era’ by recruiting 2 & 3-star players to serve as its foundation. Moreover, since we’ve been so awful, character is literally the only crutch left to lean on, and it rings rather hollow/sounds like a tired excuse since it isn’t like we had a bunch of Ron Artests previously, we had 4 and 5-star recruits who had excellent character. Looking at Bzdelik’s weak recruiting at Colorado, and his weak recruiting here, now all we have are worse players than we did in the past, with prospectively comparable good character. This is not a good thing
MHayes: Right now it’s just us going back and forth. We’re not seeing eye to eye, and maybe people will chime in tomorrow. As for now, I’m going to bed hoping the Deacs will pull one out tomorrow night.
DC Cardinal: Instead of the continuous complaining, you should be the coach yourself. You obviously know more than anyone else.
RAJohnston: I assume this is directed at Grand Tanyon and not MHayes?

The point is, that I’m not some troll, and that this deserves some attention and however uncomfortable it is, you as leader of the blog need to admonish, this time, one of your admins. who’s not doing his job right. He’s losing his temper and having to apologize more than participants, and policing in a way that’s making this place as a forum simply a nest for people who like bzdelik to agree with each other, conduct listed above by RAJohnston makes this place feel incredibly unfriendly to anyone who disagrees with him. That’s probably a reason why the people who don’t like bzdelik here hardly participate compared to samuraifoochs, joshuar, and willisb. Very respectfully, it feels like the way this blog’s run is that superficially we’re all supposed to respect each other, but the people who dissent from an admin. like RAJohnston’s opinion on Coach Bzdelik, aren’t treated very respectfully, and that’s probably the main reason this blog only gets sporadic participation by people who disagree (and gather info. & very civilly lodge their opinions against Coach Bzdelik) with the direction of the WF basketball program. It feels like to people like DaDeacs, me, Jeremy Bishop, JFizzle86, GTS, and many others, that they can at most just put in a brief word because this just isn’t a friendly place for them to express their opinion dissenting from admins. like RAJohnston.

The civility by people who don’t have a positive opinion of Bzdelik just hasn’t been reciprocated, and I’d respectuflly like some feedback instead of having my comment deleted :). This doesn’t go towards you or WakeJake because it’s been all RAJohnston who’s been “in charge” lately. If you look at his behavior, losing his temper and saying petty things like accusing people of “spewing lies,” it’s ridiculous. And I don’t bring up his age as an insult. Maybe he’s just not mature enough to keep his temper in check, or policing comments by people who actually are being uncivil, e.g. making accusations without backing them up with anything, better.

Pretty much, this makes it feel like this is the place for people to go if you like Coach Bzdelik, because based on RAJohnston’s behavior, and the unchecked behavior of people like Josh accusing our people of stuff he never seems to justify or back-up, towards both the leading people and the little people who dissent from his line on the coach, and if we disagree, that we should or have to go somewhere else like the message boards.

Does that make sense? Please don’t delete this comment, people like us need some feedback because otherwise it’s clear by the disproportionately intense behavior and activity of people who agree with those who control the blog in relation to the relatively meager participation of people who dissent from that line and don’t have positive vibes about where WF basketball is headed, and this place will just be an echo chamber for people who rah rah one-sidedly.

Port Arthur, TX

by Screamin' Demons on Feb 11, 2011 9:51 PM EST up reply actions  

There has to be a truce here, or it's just going to keep getting ugly.

I’ve asked both sides to relax. And no one has listened to me. It’s an echo chamber on both sides. I’ve tried to let this thing play itself out on its own. Obviously, that wasn’t a good call.

What do you propose I do, aside from reprimanding my writer? Because all I’m seeing is the same regurgitated multi-paragraph diatribes on both sides with no additional merit. It’s mushroomed into this almost-laughable fiasco.

You say you’re not trolling, and that’s fine. But I’ll let RA defend himself if he wants to. He’s an adult. That’s his call. I’m not going to speak for him or tell him what to do. He’s picked up the slack when I have been unable to at times, and he’s the most consistent contributor to this site in the last year. Part of what makes him important to Blogger So Dear is that he IS on campus, he is a student, he is passionate, he is close to it all.

That’s I guess where you and I differ on this. You mentioned:

First, he’s just a student who’s younger than almost all of us here – this is unlike all of the other ACC blogs to the best of my knowledge.

I started this site as a senior in college. Many of the other SBN blogs are run by high schoolers, college kids and guys getting their graduate degrees. Still others were STARTED by people in the 16-23 age bracket, and they have continued to manage the site while younger people spring up to help out. That’s one of those things we can agree to disagree on, but I’ve talked with people on a lot of the SBN blogs.

This isn’t my first day on the job here. The ACC, and the network at large, is made up of a wide range of individuals, from age to profession. It’s honestly fascinating to see everyone’s backgrounds. Hell, the Orlando Magic blog, which is one of the best run blogs in the network IMO was started by a 16-year-old.

I don’t want people of the same view saying the same thing. I disagree with RA, vehemently at times, with some of the things he believes and has seen on the court. Jake and I have argued. MB (despite him being in England and being unable to contribute as much recently) and I have arguments. We aren’t homogeneous, not in the slightest.

Like I said in my message to you, all I want is rational discourse. People are getting worked up and it’s building and building. I thought it would all cool down. I wish it had.

So I’m telling EVERYONE once again, be friendly, keep it civil, don’t get personal, don’t bicker over line by line and imply or infer things just for the sake of making your argument stronger or attacking or reinforcing a point you’re trying to make. I’m getting really tired of seeing that time in and time out.

This goes for everyone, not just you SD, or GTS, or Josh, or RA or anyone else making comments. SD if you want to write for the site instead and think you can do a good job, go right ahead. We can talk about that if you want. If you think Johnston is doing a bad job and think you can do more for the blog from your perspective, I’d love to have you. It requires a lot of work, so if you’re willing to put that in, great. I need more help.

If not, don’t chastise people for having their own opinions. It has been ugly on both sides, and both sides need to take a second to collect themselves and reevaluate just how important this argument on a website really is to them.

But RA’s been here for a long time, and has done some pretty great stuff, and I guess you just haven’t read it. I have. I manage this site. I pick my writers.

I want you to continue to post here. I want you to feel like your opinion is respected and valued. I want that from all of my readers. But with that respect comes respect in return for everyone else. And pointing fingers back in forth isn’t providing that. It’s a chicken-egg situation at this point in time. I just can’t deal with it anymore.

So, I’ll ask again. please, everyone, relax. Be nice to each other. Don’t prod and troll and try to work each other up. There is a pro and an anti side to this. And trust me, I’ve heard both sides. Plenty. And both have merit. So discuss it, but discuss it in a rational matter.

That’s all I’m asking. If everyone can’t handle that, then I’ll make some decisions in the future. But I’m going to give you guys the benefit of the doubt. All of you.

Bah da da da da da da da, Go Deacs.

Blogger So Dear

by Martin Rickman on Feb 11, 2011 10:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Complaint - Please Don't Delete, We Who Disagree Need Feedback

I think you’re overstating the age thing a little bit. I spend literally a sentence surmising that it might have something to do with RA’s itchy trigger finger to attack people commenting and poorly police the forum, and you spend 3 paragraphs on it. To restate, all I surmised that maybe age had something to do with RA’s overall poor behavior.

It’s nice to hear that you, MB, WakeJake, and RA disagree sometimes, but that doesn’t really matter to the rest of us. The fact that you guys can express dissent respectfully amongst yourselves, a bunch of friends from and still in college, isn’t surprising. The problem we’re talking about involves how this forum operates, and how your internal relationships that tolerate disagreeing opinions doesn’t at all reflect how conduct is both pursued and policed here.

The point is that those of us who don’t see many positives about the coach, are neither being treated with equal respect as we treat those who see positives in the coach, nor are we protected by admins. like RA.

The point is, it’s not as simple as saying “Ah, both sides do it 50/50, we just need to remind everyone to respect each other and that’ll make both culpable sides normalize their behavior towards each other.” I (and say this next word with emphasis) respectfully request you to show where one of us, from our leaders to our little people – DaDeacs, me, Jeremy Bishop, GTS, or JFizzle86 – has said anything to those who dissent from our position on coach bzdelik that is remotely close to what people like RA and JoshuaR have been saying to us.

For example, RA jumped on GTS and accused him of " spewing lies ",

You are entitled to your opinion, I would just prefer that you not spew it as fact when it is almost certainly not the case.
and had to recant his that accusation because as it turned out he had totally misinterpreted GTS’s point.

Then JoshuaR accused GTS of “wanting players who are harming the program on the team,” and “wanting players to just walk over coach bzdelik.”

So you are a proponent of keeping players who are harming the program on the team? You want players to just walk over Bzdelik and any policies he implemented?
I guarantee you, if any of US had accused RA or anyone with a positive opinion of the coach of something similar to that, we’d be getting in trouble here.

Then, when all that was said was that if it’s never revealed why Tabb was dismissed, that the dismissal of a 4-star recruit coupled with our really, really bad season and the coach’s resume might create more doubt in a 4 or 5-star recruit’s mind, RA accused GTS again, saying he was trying to " spin ," everything that Coach Bzdelik does

I just don’t think that trying to spin everything that Coach Bzdelik does or says is a very good way to support the University that we care about in a public forum. That’s all.
And then, after MHayes & GTS had completed a totally civil conversation, DC Cardinal had this to say:
MHayes: I would say that Williams and McFarland panned out. CJ Harris also is a 3* who I believe will be looked at as panning out. I agree that this cannot be a regular occurrence if we want to compete in the ACC and nationally. From the looks of the prospects for 2012, it won’t be.
GTS: Considering that we went 36 years between conference championships in football, citing the 2006 football team IMO is rather utopian, & citing the football program is more ominous than hope-inspiring

Chas McFarland & L.D. Williams were recruited as role players, not cornerstones.

In contrast, we are commemorating a ‘new era’ by recruiting 2 & 3-star players to serve as its foundation. Moreover, since we’ve been so awful, character is literally the only crutch left to lean on, and it rings rather hollow/sounds like a tired excuse since it isn’t like we had a bunch of Ron Artests previously, we had 4 and 5-star recruits who had excellent character. Looking at Bzdelik’s weak recruiting at Colorado, and his weak recruiting here, now all we have are worse players than we did in the past, with prospectively comparable good character. This is not a good thing
MHayes: Right now it’s just us going back and forth. We’re not seeing eye to eye, and maybe people will chime in tomorrow. As for now, I’m going to bed hoping the Deacs will pull one out tomorrow night.
DC Cardinal: Instead of the continuous complaining, you should be the coach yourself. You obviously know more than anyone else.
RAJohnston: I assume this is directed at Grand Tanyon and not MHayes?

Not only was RA not trying to ensure that those that with differing opinions on the season and the coach treated each other with equal respect, he wanted to make sure that DC Cardinal’s insult went GTS’s way.

The main reason why there’s such disproportionate representation of people like SamuraiFoochs, JoshuaR, WillisB, and MHayes, who like the coach, and there’s such disproportionately meager participation by people who dissent from that line, like me, DaDeac, GTS, Jeremy Bishop, & JFizzle86, on this blog, is because the rule of people treating each other with equal respect is totally superficial due to prejudiced policing that doesn’t protect people like DaDeac, GTS, Jeremy Bishop, me, or JFizzle86.

People who disagree from the pro-bzdelik line only sporadically participate because when we do, we’ve been told that we “want the coach to lose,” that we “want players who will/to walk all over the coach,” and when our leader gts provides more objective data for us to talk about (certainly more than any of the other side gathers) in assessing the season, we’re pretty much either accused of things without qualification and marginalized since admins. like RA not only won’t protect us from ad homs, but will go so far as to make sure that we make sure that we know we’re on the receiving end of them.

The level of respect simply isn’t equal, and it shows in how sparse the participation level is of people who disagree with the opinions of people like RA and JoshuaR, who are allowed to walk all over us by freely making pretty damning accusations. When you say things like “you’re spewing lies,” “whatever you’re saying’s spin,” “you want players who are bad for the program,” and “you want players who will walk all over the WF coach,” they need to be backed up. RA and JoshuaR haven’t justified any of these comments with anything. It’s simply maltreatment and nothing’s done about it, and that’s why people like us hardly participate here. But this place isn’t supposed to be a nest for people who have a positive view of jeff bzdelik to be able to trash people who want to participate but don’t share that view. When you make accusations like those above, they require some kind of justification. And there isn’t any! They’re just insults!

Again, I emphatically ask you not to delete this comment and provide us with some feedback. It’s not as simple as “both sides are just 50/50 getting out of hand and it’s time to corral the cats back into good order.” No. I respectfully challenge you to show me where any of us who are not as high on coach bzdelik like GTS, DaDeac, JFizzle86, Jeremy Bishop, or I have shown any disrespect towards others like JoshuaR and RAJohnston have.

I swear you if any of us had accused RA or JoshR of “spewing lies,” or of wanting players that would walk all over the coach, or of wanting player that would harm the program, we would be receiving warnings or getting banned. It’s ridiculous.

I emphatically ask you not to hit delete, and to give us some feedback. Show us where any of us have accused anyone high on coach bzdelik of things on par with what RA and JoshuaR have accused us of so freely? If you can’t, I advise you to do *some*thing about it. I know he’s “your writer” and a college buddy but you have to draw the line somewhere, we get treated like dirt and haven’t said anything like what we’re constantly being accused of by people like RA & JoshuaR.

Port Arthur, TX

by Screamin' Demons on Feb 12, 2011 2:14 AM EST up reply actions  

Ha!

gt!

A loss is a loss, there is no getting around that, but definite improvement from a team with mediocre big players, and no Ari Stewart…

I was unable to see or listen to the game (sick little ones), but a friend wondered if the absence of Ari Stewart wasnt the reason for the improved play since he is a streaky player with suspect rebounding skills…

I was glad to see Walker finally showing some basketball competency now for the second time at home. This is what we expected his freshmen year based on his high rating (since some of us here are overly concerned with such things), and it will be interesting to see if he can continue to play with consistency as our only center, and if it will be enough to start him next year in the post.

Lets hope this loss is enough to push them to try just a smidgeon harder against State…

Go Deacs!

by TheDeacon on Feb 10, 2011 10:10 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The only go-to Wake Forest blog for breaking news, opinions, and game analysis.

Site Owner/Managing Editor

1939093_small Martin Rickman

Editors

Ldcrunk_small WakeJake

24209_10150118159540442_563585441_11240310_5673529_n_small RAJohnston

Writers

Mckie_small BJohnston

41840_ncaa_wake_forest_texas_basketball_small Robert Reinhard

Small SamuraiFoochs

Chris-paul_small pegrcc9