What Went Wrong?

by RPhilpott on Feb 11, 2009 11:05 PM EST

On a night where Duke and UNC are dominating people's focus, Wake found themselves down 20 points in the second half on the road to a lower tier NC State team. While Wake Forest made a valient effort in the last 4 minutes, it was just a little too late for the Deacons to pull out a victory in Raleigh. This loss came down to a few key issues: Rebounding, Free Throws, and Defense (subcategory: Turnovers). Let's look into these areas:

Rebounding: Defensive rebounding continues to be a problem for this team. With the size that Wake Forest puts on the floor this bothers me to no end. There needs to be a more concerted effort by the entire team before we will see improvement. There were multiple times this team failed to box out on a missed free throw giving NC State additional opportunities to score. FREE THROWS. You have a designated spot clearly labeled on the floor, just protect that spot. Until Wake improves here they will continue to put themselves in compromising situations against teams with less talent.

Free Throws: Wake fouled early and often, sending State to the free throw line 31 times, to Wake Forest's 16. Additionally the Demon Deacons only shot 56% from the line. They need to convert on those points more often. Wake was -14 points from the free throw line and that really hurts a team.

Defense: State did an excellent job switching defenses often to confuse the Wake offense. Showing several different zone looks, including a box-and-one on Teague, the Pack was able to force the Deacs into 18 three-point attempts. Furthermore, Teague was clearly less assertive due to the zone and only attempted 3 shots the entire game. Combine these stats with 17 turnovers and it is easy to see why State was able to upset a struggling Wake Forest team.

Silver Lining: FSU is ranked and coming to the Joel on Saturday, which is usually a good recipe for Wake. Let's hope we can get things turned around in time to finish February strong and gain some momentum going into March. Things are certainly going to have to change significantly for this to happen though. Additionally, James Johnson had a very good night and was almost able to pull the team over the hump when others were struggling.

Tweet Comment 7 comments | 0 recs |

Do you like this story?

Comments

Silver lining: Gary!

Bah da da da da da da da, Go Deacs.

Blogger So Dear

by Martin Rickman on Feb 12, 2009 12:18 AM EST reply actions

Stat I used to dazzle sportswriters before the press conference tonight: Wake has now been a part of 5 court rushings this year. That has to be a new record.

Bah da da da da da da da, Go Deacs.

Blogger So Dear

by Martin Rickman on Feb 12, 2009 12:37 AM EST reply actions

We need to take a step back and reevaluate what Wake really brings to the table. We all know about the talent, so the question I ask is this: does Dino know how to motivate a team that knows they are good?

by SHammonds on Feb 12, 2009 2:16 AM EST reply actions

Also, it is a box-and-one zone defense, meaning there is a 4 man box zone and a man guarding the best offensive player on the other team. I’m sure box-in-one was a typo, but you made a good point and I wanted it to be clarified.

by SHammonds on Feb 12, 2009 2:25 AM EST up reply actions

Thanks for catching that. I know what a box-and-one is.

by WakeJake on Feb 12, 2009 9:20 AM EST up reply actions

The problems against zones is readily apparant. Why any team would choose to play mantoman against Wake amazes me. UNC and Duke could not handle Wake in a man. Teams that have zoned force the Deacons into uncomfortable looks and shots. The mid-range game has to pick up. They will not get better with 3s this year. When NCST changed to man at the beginning of the 2d half, Wake started a run, boom Tine Out and a defensive switch back to zone. Until Wake starts flashing the middle of the zone, instead of working the sides, no team should be in anything but a 2/3 or Box AND 1. And rebounding—the simple solution is that no one and I mean no one is allowed to start out on the break until there are no offensive rebounds against you. Everyone is too concerned again with the run out after a miss. You can’t run without the rebound — that means everyone. We discussed earlier the issue of players trying to block everything and being out of position. It helps the FG% against but without any weak side help, they’re getting killed on the glass.

by askmikeandscott on Feb 12, 2009 8:26 AM EST reply actions